GOOD LUCK

I saw it happen.

An allegedly reputable cnn anchor asked an alleged cnn ‘expert’ what she thought of b.o.’s handling of the US reaction to the Libyan developments, whether or not she thought that b.o. had done about as well as could have been expected thus far.

Cannot quote her answer….but in so many words:

The problems are delicate. The US has to walk a tightrope…for, you know, G.W. Bush and Exxon and Big Oil and so on and so on cozied up to the madman and that is the reason why we have this problem today.

Cnn anchor did not question the answer.

I trust there is no need to refine the picture.

There was NO attempt to answer the question of b.o.’s dithering…pusillanimous response action/reaction….nada…….

b.o. faced a tuff problem…he still does, many of ‘em…and he has botched it ….

And msm BLAMES IT ON G.W. AND EXXON AND OUR FLAMING GORGING ON THE CHEAPEST FUEL AVAILBLE……WHILE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT [READ b.o. admin.] forbids development of oil resources.

Bottom line: you cannot trust the msm.
You cannot trust lots of sources….
Soooooooooooo…you have to really discriminate and think and talk to lots of folks with differing opinions and read lots of uppity journals and stuff…and then hope you get to some kernels of truth.

Cnn can be ok….but not always. Not always bigtime!

Same for all the msm….Fox included…..

So you hafta discriminate.

The job is to figure out how.

Same thing for a successful national leader.

He or she does not have to be the most knowledgeable [sharpests] knife in the drawer…but he or she has to know how to find the sharpest knives…..

We the public have to ferret out the best sources of truth as well if we are to know what is really going on.

GOOD LUCK!